Nov 19

GQ isn’t part of my staple reading diet, but every so often my personalized Google News feed pulls in a great story loaded with actionable insights. Last month, it was an article on the breakout of personal genomics, entitled, “The Book of Me.”

Today GQ published an article online on  four-star General David Petraeus, entitled, “Leader of the Year.” A key graph:

He starts by talking about his father, Sixtus Petraeus, who passed away six months ago at the age of 92. Petraeus couldn’t even leave Iraq to bury him. (As he puts it, “Our soldiers make all the same sacrifices.”) Sixtus was a Dutch sea captain who came to the U.S. at the start of World War II, “when Holland was overrun. He was at sea, and they couldn’t go back to Rotterdam, so they went to New York.” He was “a stubborn, independent Dutchman” who was both extraordinarily proud of his only son and a strict disciplinarian who pushed him to the limit. “I was raised by the kind of father who if his son could do twenty pull-ups, he wanted you to do twenty-one. There were, you know, no excuses. I mean, there was a phrase he actually used: Results, boy.’ ” 

Later on in the article, writer Lisa DePaulo notes that the patterns of change experimented with and refined to success by Petraeus when he was running the 101 Airborne Division in Mosul in 2003, did not come from the top of the “theatre” or Pentagon command structure. They came from “the fringe,” or as Petraeus says:

“Well, I would sort of think it was intuitively obvious. To be truthful…strategic leaders make big decisions at times. And at my level, in the first year and very early on, a huge decision was to say, ‘We are going to do nation building.’ I know that we as a country didn’t think the military should get into nation building and all this. But very early on, we decided in the 101st that we’re gonna do it…” 

Those who have followed the Iraq war in depth — and not just through the superficial coverage in most of the press — will know that Petraeus was not popular with his “uplines” in the command structure for his views or for the successes he achieved in Mosul, even though he did it without “glory-seeking” or challenging the chain of command. ** 

After his outstandingly successful Mosul tour of duty was up, Petraeus was transferred by his superiors in the Pentagon command structure, back to a desk job for awhile (where he wrote a new Army field manual on counterinsurgency strategy), before being plucked out by President Bush to turn the war around.

That’s an oversimplified and truncated version of events, but the point is that Petraeus didn’t wait for those “smarter” than him, “more experienced” than him in the “same old same old” to tell him what to do, within his legitimate sphere of decision making and action taking.

As an aside, if you enjoy romances, writer Lisa DePaulo humorously shares how Petraeus met and courted his wife. DePaulo notes with supreme deadpan:

Perhaps the “wildest” thing was when he [young cadet Petraeus] ended up dating the daughter of the superintendent (who also happened to be a three-star, soon to be four-star general named William Knowlton) of West Point. Or “the Supe’s daughter,” as she was known. Knowlton was a man you didn’t want to mess with… 

SPEAKING OF AMWAY GLOBAL, have you thought about how real change — and as Petraeus puts it, “irreversible success,” — is going to come to your business? As Bridgett put it in a comment at IBOFB’s Amway Talk blog a couple days ago, change always happens at the fringes first.

** disclosure: one of my cousins served with the 101 Airborne in Mosul as an army doc for two years, which has added to the respect I have for Petraeus’ approach to modeling personal leadership and responsibility.

written by rdknyvr \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Nov 11

Fortune Magazine, in an article published online Nov. 10, has yet again provided a fascinating insight into why Apple is both the ‘Most Admired Company’ in North America (if not the world), and perhaps the best run company too. Much of the public credit goes to iconic founder and “reinventor” Steve Jobs. But this article reveals one of Job’s less-remarked-on skills — the ability to develop a deep bench of executive talent to support and extend the ‘Apple Vision’.

Fortune’s Phillip Elmer-Dewitt writes at his Apple 2.0 blog — quoting from the ChangeWave Research Report released yesterday:

“It’s not easy to increase market share in one of the worst spending environments in years,” writes Carton, but Apple seems poised to do so. Among those few consumers who plan to buy a laptop in the next three months, one-third said they planned to buy an Apple — up from 29% in September.

As Amway Global prepares to wrap up another financial year and evaluates the success, thus far, of its Transformation game plan, what core goal could it set to ensure future leadership, not just in the direct sales “industry” but in a way that would empower it to stand along side industry giants in the Fortune ‘Most Admired’ list of companies. 

Remember that it was only 10 or so years ago when Apple was languishing – it stock had become a ‘laughing stock’ (before Jobs returned). Michael Dell infamously recommended that the best thing that could be done with Apple would be to liquidate it and return the remaining scraps of value to the shareholders.

Today, Apple has been surging with record-breaking growth, profits and good will while at the same time adjusting and fine-tuning price points on the strategic Macbook, iPhone and iPod lines — even while continuing to ‘add value’ to those products, and ‘build out’ from the base of raving fans (to borrow from the Ken Blanchard title) created on its common platform of iPod, iPhone, Macbook and worlds’ most customer-friendly software interface.

SPEAKING OF AMWAY, is Amway Global the kind of enterprise which should aspire to being mentioned with respect and admiration (and, by its IBOs, with pride) in the same breath as Apple, Google, Goldman Sachs, Johnson & Johnson, Berkshire Hathaway, or Toyota?

Could Amway Global — and that includes independent business owners — pull off its own ”Cinderella story“?

Well, why not? 

written by rdknyvr \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Oct 28

Buried at the end of the last post — on the GQ magazine story related to Personalized Health — was a jewel of a link to a quick, four-minute streaming video from the Interleukin Genetics site. It’s simply titled, The Science Behind Interleukin Genetics

If you’ve ever pondered over how to explain to a retail customer (or a potential business associate) what the Gensona DNA tests are about and the life-long value of the information they provide, now you don’t (have to ponder). Just refer your retail customer or potential business associate to this link for a quick, easy-to-understand presentation.

The Science Behind Interleukin Genetics

****************

Still with me? Attention span longer than you  thought? (hehe) 

Beyond that, you should still know something about the Nutrilite brand and why it gives us such a unique position in the marketplace. If you don’t know how to talk about Nutrilite’s history and the just-in-time fresh fresh freshness of the organic functional-whole-food-based products you represent, here are a few more “movies” to which you can go (and take your retail customer along).

Washington State organic farm

Mexico organic farm

Brazil organic farm

Optimal Health: The Heart of the Original Brand

Lifestyle

Personalization

Nutrigenomics

Nutrilite clinical validation studies

Nutrilite research associations

SPEAKING OF AMWAY, don’t foget to watch this space for a timely and provocative three-part series coming very soon from the pen keyboard of Chuck Lia.

Blessings for a great day… :)

written by rdknyvr \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Oct 13

Interesting pricing adjustment was recently put into place for the eSpring Health Technology product line. Did anyone else notice that the retail price on the eSpring unit was adjusted down by about 27%? And the price on the replacement filter was also adjusted by about 25%? If you’re in a market other than Canada, check for the exact adjustment made in your area.

This move makes eSpring a highly competitive value proposition, and should now be considered a key resource for anyone wanting to finance their business based on do-able retail sales. That should include everyone, from new business owner to Crown Ambassadors wanting to set the example and show leadership in retail sales.

One should be particularly delighted by this move as eSpring is part of the Personalized Health “products and services portfolio” in that it addresses the pure water aspect of environmental health needs better than any other water purifying/filtering product on the market. eSpring is still the ONLY household consumer product on the market which includes an ultraviolet light component to address biological entities  which could make it through the solid block carbon filter.

Now that the Amway Global has adjusted prices on this product to make it exceptionally competitive for us at retail, the question becomes, whether IBOs are going to respond and start driving sales and creating more consumables-based retail profits for our businesses.

Speaking of Amway Global, how much will this affect the focus you are putting into your First Circle, Personal Profit Circle, retail sales?

written by rdknyvr \\ tags: , , , , ,

Jul 29

Just in case there are any genuinely committed business builders reading this blog who are building an Amway Wellness (ie. Nutrilite, Gensona, etc.), or an Amway Beauty business (which could include relevant Gensona tests at some point) this brief post will draw your attention to an interesting blog on personal genomicsgenomeboy — and an excellent new article in Wired magazine on Harvard University’s George Church and developments in genomics, sequencing and synthetic biology.

A number of personalized genomics companies are mentioned in the article — some of whom are potential competitors, but not in our direct sales channel (yet) and some who are strictly in the personalized medicine space, not the personalized health space where we (Alticor/Amway/Quixtar) are positioned. Some of these include: 23andme, funded in part by Google; Navigenics, funded in part by Kleiner Perkins; DNA Direct, Sciona, Knome, and a few others.

 By the way, in case the inclusion of references to personal genomics and synthetic biology seems far fetched, they will in short order have a major impact on our area of business interest — Personalized Health and Wellness.

Finally, if the links above to Amway Wellness and Amway Beauty seem broken, it’s because at the time of this writing AmwayWellness is registered to Weber Shandwick, a consultancy which I’m surmising has been contracted by Alticor. And the AmwayBeauty domain is registered to Alticor through MarkMonitor.

This post is an addendum to my posts on Personalized Health on this site from June 23 and July 22, and Chuck Lia’s excellent posts from March 24 and May 1, this year.

Speaking of Chuck, he has just gotten back home to Atlanta from a few days in Southern California with his family.  Watch for a thought-provoking post from him later this week on … can’t tell you but it will be good!!!

written by rdknyvr \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jul 29

A few days ago, Forbes Magazine published an article on former Quixtar IBO and TEAM co-founder Orrin Woodward that suggested Woodward’s training system business, now ported over to MonaVie, is little more than a thinly disguised “pyramid selling scheme.” The article, while not really critical of Amway per se, revealed a basic lack of understanding on the part of the Forbes reporters of direct sales business models which are legally and gainfully employing — many part time and some full time – millions of Americans and Canadians.

 In anticipation of the article’s publication, and after Forbes interviews with Alticor and Amway executives in Ada, Michigan, Amway sent a confidential communication out to all Diamonds and above, which was leaked by an astute and sympathetic Diamond (I’ve no clue who so don’t ask me) to the independent Amway commentary sites Amway Wiki, Amway Watch, Amway Talk, and The Truth About Amway.

In that letter, Amway executives promised,

We may object to aspects of these articles and will follow up with the publications regarding inaccuracies and misstatements … we remain committed to telling our own story and have invested an unprecedented amount in a national ad campaign, sponsorships, and public relations programs. Through these efforts, we will openly and transparently communicate who we are and what we stand for, creating greater awareness and favorability for our business opportunity and product brands – ultimately strengthening this business opportunity and the potential for success for every hard-working Independent Business Owner.

So, while the business and system critics were jumping up and down in their high chairs, spitting up, and throwing their food on the floor, what did Alticor do?

Alticor quietly purchased a significant volume of banner ads at Forbes.com, taking a positive upbeat approach with banner ad versions of the already familiar and popular ”Hello, my name is...” and “Now you know” ads which have been running so successfully in other media.

Was that a brilliant move or what!!!

SPEAKING OF AMWAY, what has Alticor learned from it’s PR battles of last year, and are they now performing in a much more transparent, proactive, and positive manner, consistent with the goals of the Transformation initiatives?

It’s a given that last year was a bumpy ride for Alticor PR particularly as they worked with green and “Internet-inexperienced” outside crisis management consultants who had no understanding of the community nature of and loyalty associated with our business model, to respond to a uniquely bitter legal attack by TEAM.

But has Alticor learned from that experience in the truest sense of being a Peter Senge ‘learning organization’?

I say ‘Yes’, in spades. What say ye?

written by rdknyvr \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jul 24

TWO VERY INTERESTING articles and a TV story about Alticor and Amway were published today online, with markedly different perspectives. The first site to pick up on the pending Forbes article was IBOFightBack at Amway Talk followed a bit later by a brief post at the IBOAI blog site.                                            

Forbes article link: Climb to the Top   

Information Week article link: Amway Parent Catches iPhone Fever

TV Story: First Steps health initiative in Grand Rapids: article and video link with Alticor CEO Doug DeVos

The Forbes story focuses on Orrin Woodward’s TEAM – unflatteringly — and also touches on Amway in a tangential way. With respect to Amway, the Forbes ’business reporters’ clearly have little understanding of the direct sales channel despite having talked with the Direct Selling Association, and seemed to perjoratively tag anything to do with direct sales as a “pyramid,” (although allowing for a false distinction between “legal” and “illegal” pyramids — no such thing as a “legal pyramid selling scheme”). There seemed to be no understanding of network marketing as a viable, non-pyramid-structured sales channel.

To put the whole article in perspective, the best response I’ve seen so far was in the Forbes article’s reader comments from a ‘JCSmith9898′ who said:

As an Amway/Quixtar business owner in Michigan, I was very glad A/Q terminated Woodward and his Team leadership. Many times, I have met with people who have a distorted view of my business because of the Team’s focus on tool training profits and a building approach that made money for the top guys with little left for the new guy — if taught to structure an Amway biz properly, the new guy can make good money too — Amway should be congratulated for cleaning house of organizations that are damaging its reputation.

About an hour later, the second article was published online by Information Week, about an iPhone pilot being considered by Alticor for its Amway North America “sales force.” (Yes, that’s how you are considered by the corporate world — an independent, self-employed commission-based sales force.) The tone here was much different, as one might expect from a cutting edge business/tech publication:

Ada, Michigan-based Alticor is the parent company of Amway, which for almost a half-century has sold household items and nutritional supplements to U.S. consumers through a contracted sales force.

And a bit later,

Alticor’s IT team is building the applications for the pilot now. Beginning in January 2009, the program will be limited to a pre-selected group of 150 or so independent business owners… The iPhone trial is part of a larger effort to create a suite of Amway-specific mobile business applications and make them available to the sales force. The trial will look at how well the apps function over the iPhone and how they affect sales results.

A tale of two cities, a tale of two articles. One set of journalists taking a ‘National Inquirer’ approach, the other looking to a mobile ’Web 2.0′ future.

Finally, a seemingly unrelated story from Grand Rapids today about a new initiative called First Steps to help underpriviledged pre-school aged children access the health care and learning opportunties they  need to be successful when they enter school. Who is leading this initiative by donating from its profits, and donating CEO Doug DeVos’s time? Watch the video at the link above and see for yourself.

An example of Compassionate Capitalism* at work?

SPEAKING OF AMWAY, what do these perpectives say to you about Alticor’s attempts to be better at Transparency, to implement Transformation and move to focus emphatically on increased retail sales? Do these kinds of articles give Alticor a stronger hand in enforcing the Accreditation ground rules? Is your System/LOA really on board with the First Circle personal profit retailing concept or is it, in your view, just paying lip service?

What are you doing personally to implement the Transformation process into your business? How are you using technology to build your business, specifically, your First Circle personal retail sales, and developing consistent retail customers?

 INTEGRATING the ideas from the two stories and video clip above, do you have a goal, a mission, a desire to invest some of your business profits into something that will make a difference in your community? ie. TRANSFORM your community? Can you do that with the income you’re earning from your Quixtar/Amway business now?

* Compassionate Capitalism was the title of Rich DeVos’s landmark book published in 1993

(PS. Please don’t use this as a forum to slag TEAM or Woodward… go somewhere else if you have issues with them)

written by rdknyvr \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jul 14

“It just seems to me you aren’t going to be credible if all you talk about is your successes.”JAMES CANALES, President and CEO of The James Irvine Foundation, one of California’s ten largest foundations

“A real leader learns ways to promote and reward truth-telling, demands honesty from his or her crew, and never punishes messengers with bad news.”C. MICHAEL ABRASHOFF, former Commander of the “Best Damn Ship in the Navy, the U.S.S. Benfold,” and the author of three New York Times bestsellers on leadership, including It’s Your Ship

Amway is currently in the first year of a major business transformation.  It goes almost without saying that all businessmen understand that turning a company like Amway North America around is no easy task and takes tremendous skill and expertise.  Well, Steve Miller is affectionately nicknamed “U.S. Industry’s Mr. Fix It” by America’s business leaders for his unparalleled success in turning around failing companies.  In 2002 the Wall Street Journal asked Miller if he would share with the Journal’s subscribers his thoughts on the most important aspects of turning a company around.  That request resulted in an article in the WSJ by Miller that same year titled “Tips From A Turnaround Specialist.  Allow me to note that Steve Miller is the former CEO of Delphi Corporation and the author of the recent book release The Turnaround Kid:  What I Learned Rescuing America’s Most Troubled Companies.  As Amway Global is in the midst of its transformation today, its turnaround if you will, I thought after reading Miller’s book that looking at Amway’s North American business transformation today in light of Miller’s seven tips might be a worthwhile online exercise.  Below is a list of Miller’s seven tips with my comments added after each tip.  I would be interested in hearing your comments about these seven tips as well.

TIPS FROM A TURNAROUND SPECIALIST by Steve Miller

1.  Tell everyone the truth, especially if the truth hurts.

This is the one issue I find most disappointing about Amway’s public image.  As James Canales says in the quote leading off this post, only bringing up the positive undermines your credibility.  Publicly owning up to challenges adds credibility to the positive things a company says.  A few weeks ago, Microsoft lost a court case.  Within hours their media and PR folks (are you listening Amway/Alticor Media Blog?) released a statement saying “we still believe in our position and expect to appeal.”  So, even when a current outcome isn’t positive Microsoft at least publicly acknowledges the current state of affairs.  Every time Amway fails to acknowledge or comment on a recent negative court ruling or public event (as has been the case multiple times this year alone) it loses a little more credibility with me and others, and it will continue to lose credibility until its actions in this area become more transparent — or I and others no longer care about Amway enough to be concerned about its failure to be fully forthcoming.  In my opinion, Amway’s failure to openly discuss negative news and outcomes shows weakness and frailty, not strength and resolve — and I believe the company is stronger and more resilient than that.  It’s well past time to demonstrate it when it comes to truth telling.

2.  Don’t study things to death.  Most of the choices you need to make are clear, and decisiveness breeds confidence.

Would anyone say Amway has been clear and decisive over the last twenty-five years?  While sometimes Tex can annoy people, one point that Tex makes is not refutable:  Amway has had more than enough time to deal with several critical issues, some of which were clearly delineated by Rich DeVos over twenty-five years ago.  The perception that Amway has failed to act decisively on those issues in the past has bred a lack of confidence in the company among many IBOs, and a general lack of credibility in the public at large.  Regardless of what Amway is doing today, it is accountable for failing to act in the past.

Please understand, I am not saying that Amway is not dealing with these issues in several meaningful ways today, but it is important for Amway corporate to remember how long some of these issues have been on the table.  It’s definitely time for Amway corporate to be very clear and very concise about where the company is headed.  I do get a sense that some real changes are being implemented and that the corporation is taking serious steps to turn things around, but clarity and ongoing communication about those changes and steps are critical.  The new national ad campaign is a meaningful step in the right direction on a public level, but there is much more that can be done on the IBO level.  The North America Spotlight Tour is an important step in that direction, clearly demonstrating the change and innovation coming from the company today.  This weekend the Tour stopped in Chicago, and bloggers Big Apple and Bridgett were both in attendance [as were AJ Gannon and bernsber!].  I’m looking forward to hearing from them online when they get home.  The recently announced sponsorship of the Tina Turner Tour by Amway Global is another terrific step in the right direction.  There is much positive to talk about in this area.

3.  Listen to your customers.  They know more about what’s wrong with your company, and what’s right, than anyone.

Who are Amway’s real customers?  Based on recently revealed data from court cases I think we would have to say it’s Amway’s IBOs.  Retail sales of only 3.5% of total volume can hardly be considered much in the way of true customer retail volume.  So the question morphs into which so-called “customers” is Amway listening to?  Better yet, which of its “customers” should Amway be listening to?  It’s IBOs?  It’s retail customers?  Both?  Neither, but “focus groups” instead?  Often it appears Amway’s so-called “focus groups’ are made up primarily of IBOs.  Think that one out, doing product marketing research with a captive clientele like starry-eyed new Platinums.  What we need instead is marketing research done with our target audience, potential customers with whom we have no leverage.

Just who is Amway doing its market research with?  I’d really like to know the answer to that question so I would have a better feel for the direction Amway is taking.  For what it’s worth, I believe if Amway wants to know what is wrong with these aspects of its business perhaps it should listen to some of the people who have refused to buy our products or decided not to join our business.  Ask them why, and then take their answers seriously.  The bottom line is that products purchased by IBOs are important to our success, but products that retail customers are willing to buy because they find them compelling and attractively priced are even more important to our long-term success.  We do not need or want discounted, low quality products.  Discounted products often say the wrong things about a company and its products.  (If you don’t believe that take a read of Chapter 10 “The Power of Price:  Why a 50-Cent Aspirin Can Do What a Penny Aspirin Can’t” in Dan Ariely’s book Predictably Irrational.)  At the same time, over-engineered (so-to-speak) products, expensively priced for our general clientele, also create serious credibility issues for us (think Tolsom Shaving Gel).  Neither discounted products nor high end, expensively priced products are the right approach.  Beyond that, developing products with the IBO in mind as the primary customer is borderline deceitful in regards to the marketing plan.  Hopefully we have learned something from the past on this issue and are not going to travel further down this road.

As an aside, IBOs are customers of Amway in a different and rather unique way:  We are asked to promote the business to other potential business owners.  So in a very real sense we are “business” customers of Amway.  We have to “buy” into the Amway business, and then effectively “promote” it to others.  We have to believe it has real value, not only to us, but to others as well, if we are going to build profitable IBO business networks that move products to end users.  How do you feel about the value of an Amway business in the marketplace today?  Personally I’d say an individual Amway business is more valuable today than it was a few years ago, and it also has greater potential than ever.  I’d also add however that it has some serious issues it needs to overcome if our company and our business opportunity are going to recapture their places as the industry leaders in North America.

4.  Listen to your people.  Consult everyone, from the boiler room at the plant to the executive suite so you become fully informed.  Invite everyone to send e-mails, and answer them!  (emphasis Miller’s)

My personal experience tells me that Amway does this decently on every level but one.  The Opportunity Zone corporate sponsored blogs have been a terrific new approach and have demonstrated Amway’s willingness to listen to everyone and anyone with virtually no censorship.  They are moderated by talented and interesting people like Robin Luymes and Beth Dornan, and have convinced me the company is open to hearing from us.  However, what these corporate blogs have not done is convince me of Amway’s willingness to allow some of its employees to discuss the truly tough issues.  It appears that when the topics get tough, Amway goes mute, and mutes its staff as well.  On some level, this needs to change.

Another area where Amway falls down in my own limited experience is in responding to inquiries for clarification, particularly if the topic raised or the question asked has a negative connotation.  This kind of goes back to Tip #1, Amway’s apparent unwillingness to speak openly about negative issues.  A few weeks ago I sent an e-mail to Amway’s Rules Department requesting feedback on a specific issue, and was promised by e-mail reply that I would receive a prompt answer.  Since then I’ve heard nothing, and it’s been over a month.  There is tremendous room for improvement in this area. As Miller admonishes, “Answer them!”

5.  Do a wardrobe check.  If people gladly wear caps and shirts with the company logo, morale is good.  If no one wants to be identified as your employee when they go to the mall, you’re in trouble.

This tip is true of IBOs in the field as well, and needs to be directed at both corporate and IBO leaders.  I would say to Steve and Doug and the new Alticor and Amway corporate staff, if you don’t see any of your IBO leaders wanting to be identified publicly as your business owners, you’re in trouble.  You tell me, have you seen any Quixtar or Nutrilite logos on the baseball hats of any Diamonds on the recreation fields of North America lately?  Or on any of the apparel of your corporate staff on a Saturday afternoon?  Have you seen any Nutrilite logo clothing on any Diamonds outside of an Amway sponsored function?  Have you seen any XS Energy logo decals on any Diamond vehicles lately?  (I have one on mine.)  By the way, those XS Energy marketing folks really get it.  They know how to promote their product and their brand.  We should do half as well as they do.

Yes, I know, IBO leaders lead with the business (”Which business?” I might ask, but I digress), that’s why they don’t wear a hat or a polo shirt with Nutrilite’s or Quixtar’s logo on it, and why they don’t have an XS decal on their car.  It’s the curiosity approach, stupid.  Yeah, I get it, that’s the reason.

Sure it is.

Can you imagine a Nike executive having any problem wearing apparel with the company logo on it?  Any Google exec having a problem with wearing her company’s logo on a sweater?  A Celtic fan?  A Harvard student?  Been to a professional golf or tennis tournament lately?  Seen any corporate logos around?  Heck, as much as it annoys me, I’ve seen dozens of vehicles around Atlanta with large MonaVie logos and contact info on their back window.  Do we want Amway to have a reputation that we can be proud of?  Let’s start by putting ourselves on the line and have everyone go public about their affiliation with the business — and that means corporate staff and IBOs.  Then we’d be forced to truly live up to the reputation we want the company to have. 

I recently made a commitment to wear warm-up jackets, shirts, baseball hats, or something else with the Nutrilite logo on it whenever possible when I give tennis lessons to my students (I am a tennis pro), so I am going to purchase some clothing with company logos on it for myself.  I have also made a commitment to tell anyone who asks me what I do for a living (and also those who don’t ask) that I am a tennis pro who is also building an Amway business, chips fall where they may.  And I know that by doing so over time I will learn how to handle their follow-up questions appropriately, effectively, and winsomely.  I’m not interested in any more “spinmeister” answers to simple questions from prospects and friends, answers that avoid providing transparent, honest, and relevant information.  So far my commitment to candor hasn’t created a single problem for me.  I am convinced one of the best ways to deal with the negative on the internet is to demonstrate the positive aspects of the business publicly on a personal level.  If we can’t do that, then we really do have a problem. As I wrote earlier in this post, the recent national ad campaign by Amway is a great step in the right direction, but it’s time for all IBOs to come out into the open and put themselves on the line too.  Right now Amway is investing huge financial and human resources trying to tell North America the real story of Amway.  An important aspect of making that investment worthwhile to Amway is having IBOs become publicly visible as representatives of the business.  Thus, when people are looking for Amway, they’ll know where they can find it and they’ll have a better feel for the quality of the people in the business.  Clearly revealing our affiliation with Amway is one way to do just that.

6.  Practice calm realism.  The key here is to stay balanced.  Truth telling can be scary, but if you let people know there are solutions for most problems, they’ll be less discouraged.

This goes back a little to my comments in point 1.  Truth telling is scary, but it’s better than hiding the truth, and all of us know that from experience.  In May, in a move unprecendented at a U.S. corporation, the top performing insurance giant, Aflac, decided on its own to give its shareholders the right to weigh in on the issue of executive compensation.  Brian Cadman, an associate professor at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management said, “This is going to be a peer-pressure issue and it’s going to be the better-run firms that are going to start down this path.  Down the road, it’s going to be the type of thing to help Aflac signal that they are doing the right thing by their shareholder.”  Interestingly, Aflac is taking this step while they are not suffering from any public relations nightmares that might have required a face-saving response.  Aflac Chairman and CEO Daniel Amos at first said, “I was nervous [about the say-on-pay proposal].  I didn’t know what we were getting into.”  But the company decided to that it had to allow the shareholder vote on executive compensation to live up to its “corporate philosophy of openness.”

We’re beginning to see a return to respect for the truth from a number of large organizations.  After the Carnegie Foundation’s ill-starred efforts to help Zimbabwe overhaul its constitution and its government, for example, the foundation published a report that began, “This is the anatomy of a grant that failed.”  In addition, the Army has begun a critical self-assessmentof the miscues in Iraq to make sure they will never be repeated.  No company or institution can afford anymore to deceive itself about the truth about itself.  And that includes Amway.

As D. Michael Abrashoff wrote in his new book, It’s Our Ship:  The No-Nonsense Guide to Leadership,

“It is plainly suicidal today for any high stakes leader to reject bad news as is it were a live hand grenade and treat its messenger like a traitor…leaders in place or in training have an overwhelming incentive to encourage truth-telling by themselves and everyone who reports to them.  Sure, honesty can be dangerous, but, in the long run, dishonesty always loses.”

7.  You don’t need all new players to make a team into a winner.  Even at companies in crisis you’ll find lots of people who know their job and do it well.  Try to hold on to them.

I admit, this point falls outside my knowledge of Amway and Quixtar.  I don’t know the corporate staff at Amway all that well.  I’m sure several of you know them far better than I do and can comment on this point more intelligently than I can.  I do know that the people I have worked with at the company regarding specific needs I’ve had in the business (outside of the previously mentioned ones) have been terrific.  Everything I’ve read and heard about the new corporate leadership brought in by Alticor and Amway over the past year has been nothing less than stellar.  I would say this bodes well for the company’s future on all counts.

Obviously, after looking down this list, it appears Amway is doing very well on several of Miller’s tips.  It’s heartening to know that the company could easily rise to the occasion on a couple of the other points having to do with transparency and complete truth-telling.  All it would take is a total commitment to the three dynamics Steve Lieberman recently stated that Amway Global was committed to:  honesty, openness, and transparency.  I hope Amway’s leaders will jump in with both feet and deliver on that promise no matter how scary it might be.  I’m convinced doing so will pay off handsomely in the coming years.

Steve Miller obviously understands company turnaround dynamics far better than I do, so I take him at his word and his expertise that these are seven of the most important tips for turning around a company.  It seems to me to be a reasonable list and one worth contemplating in relation to Amway.  But, without wanting to be arrogant I would add an eighth tip to his list.  Here it is:

8.  If, at any time, you are not sure what to do next, refer back to Tip #1.  Telling the truth is always the best place to start.

Speaking of Amway, particularly in regards to Miller’s seven points, what are YOUR thoughts on what Amway and IBOs could do collaboratively to truly transform our business positively over the next few years?

written by Chuck Lia \\ tags: , , , , , , ,

Jul 07

Do you believe you are for the most part a “rational” IBO?  Or, would honesty require you (and me) to admit that we might be a little irrational at times, perhaps even highly irrational sometimes.  What if there was some aspect of our approach to the business that might be more irrational than rational at times, would you know how to be aware of it?  Better yet, if we could predict the area of the business we might be most irrational about, and we were aware of the cause of that irrationality, how might we use that knowledge to help us in our approach to the business?

For years I’ve been fascinated by studies into human behavior; why we do what we do and whether we even know why we do what we do.  Now, Dan Ariely, the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Behavioral Economics at MIT, where he holds joint appointment between MIT’s Media Laboratory and and the Sloan School of Management, has examined another side of human behavior, namely, how “predictably irrational” we are in many areas of life, particularly in areas where money is involved.  Ariely’s 2008 release, Predictably Irrational:  The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions, which became an instant New York Times bestseller, is a compilation of numerous fun and clever experiments in human behavior, many of which have direct implications for IBOs.  Thankfully, Ariely’s book is a very easy read and quite engaging as well.  While the book is not so much a scientific tour de force as it is a personally challenging work, it is nonetheless, very interesting.  If you enjoyed Freakonomics, you’ll find this book an equally good read.

Ariely’s book has received strong reviews.  Here are a couple of samples: 

“This is going to be the most talked about book in years.  It is so full of dazzling insights–and so engaging–that once I started reading, I couldn’t put it down.”DANIEL McFADDEN, 2000 Nobel Laureate in Economics, University of Callifornia at Berkeley, Morris Cox Professor of Economics

“A marvelous book that is both thought-provoking and highly entertainly…Ariely unmasks the subtle but powerful tricks that our minds play on us, and shows how we can prevent being fooled.”JEROME GROOPMAN, Harvard Medical School, Recanti Chair of Medicine

In one of the early chapters, “The Fallacy of Supply and Demand:  Why the Price of Pearls–and Everything Else–Is Up in the Air,” a chapter with fascinating discussions on “imprinting,” “price anchors,” and “arbitrary coherence,”Ariely notes:

“With everything you do, in fact, you should train yourself to question your repeated behaviors…We should also pay particular attention to the first decision we make in what is going to be a long stream of decisions.  When we face such a decision, it might seem to us that this is just one decision, without large consequences; but in fact the power of the first decision can have such a long-lasting effect that it will percolate into our future decisions for years to come.  Given this effect, the first decision is critical, and we should give it an appropriate amount of attention.”

“Socrates said the unexamined life is not worth living.  Perhaps it’s time to inventory the imprints and anchors in our own life.  Even if they once were completely reasonable, are they still reasonable?  Once the old choices are reconsidered, we can open ourselves to new decisions– and the new opportunities of a new day.  That seems to make sense.”

After you read Ariely’s discussion on how the pricing of black pearls came about it you might think it a worthwhile exercise to ponder the pricing on your tool system’s “Professional Starter Pack” for $250 (but hey, it’s a $750 value!).  Or why the Tolsom Shave Gel is $12.45, even if it does have 19 worthwhile ingredients not found in Nivea’s product.  Heck, the first question a rational person might ask is “Is there a sizeable retail market for a $12.45 shaving gel with forty more ingredients than Nivea?”  I’d be interested in seeing Quixtar’s figures on the retail sales of Tolsom Shave Gel to non-IBO retail customers (assuming there have been any sales to non-IBO customers).  I’m sure that would be an eye opener.  You see, despite statements to the contrary, the real issue isn’t whether our products have ”a story to tell,” it’s whether they have a compelling story to tell.  If Amway is going to come out with a product like Tolsom Shave Gel it would behoove the company to clearly demonstrate it can reasonably justify to a retail customer (the final arbiter of price) the premium price of its product, otherwise what’s the point in bringing the product to market?

Dan Ariely looks at a number of intriguing issues in his book — and one or two that are not so intriguing.  As my kids used to say when a topic was being discussed they found a little offensive or outside their social norms, “Too much information!”  And I can say with confidence that I agree with them when it comes to Chapter 5 in Ariely’s book, “The Influence of Arousal:  Why Hot Is Much Hotter Than We Realize.”  Like I said, too much information.  Read the chapter and find out for yourself if you wish.  :)

Chapters 11 and 12 touch on areas that should be of interest to all IBOs.  They are titled “The Context of Our Character, Part 1:  Why We Are Dishonest, and What We Can Do About It” and “The Context of Our Character, Part 2;  Why Dealing With Cash Makes Us More Honest.”  Near the end of Chapter 11 Ariely writes:

“What can we do to keep our country honest?…first recognize that when we get into situations where personal financial benefit stands in opposition to our moral standards, we are able to “bend” reality, see the world in terms compatible with our selfish interest, and become dishonest.  What is the answer then?  If we recognize this weakness, we can try to avoid such situations from the outset..  We can prohibit physicians from ordering tests that would benefit them financially; we can prohibit accountants and auditors from functioning as consultants to the same companies; we can bar members of Congress from setting their own salaries, and so on.”

There is much in the book that should strongly challenge every IBO to consider how rationally he or she approaches her business.  In Chapter 12 Ariely adds:

“We can hope to surround ourselves with good, moral, people, but we have to be realistic.  Even good people are not immune to being partially blinded by their own minds.  This blindness allows them to take actions that bypass their own moral standards on the road to financial rewards.  In essence, motivation can play tricks on us whether or not we are good, moral people.  As the author and journalist Upton Sinclair once noted, ‘It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.’     

At the end of Ariely’s book he writes, 

We are all pawns in a game whose forces we largely fail to comprehend.  We usually think of ourselves as sitting in the driver’s seat, with ultimate control over the decisions we make and the direction our life takes; but alas, this perception has more to do with our desires–with how we want to view ourselves–than with reality…By the time we comprehend and digest information, it is not necessarily a true reflection of reality.  Instead it is our representation of reality, and this is the input we base our decisions on.”

I have a strong suspicion that if more IBOs read books like this one, it would be far more difficult for IBO leaders to lead their IBOs down roads and in directions that are not in the downline IBOs’ best interests, nor in the best interests of Amway Global/Quixtar.  And on that basis alone it is worth reading, for what this business needs more than anything today is thinking, nuanced IBOs who will not allow themselves to be taken down non-productive, non-profitable paths, regardless of who might be promoting that path; or taken in by leaders who primarily have their own interests at heart.

Consider two final recommendations: 

Predictably Irrational is wildly original.  It shows why–much more often than we usually care to admit– humans make foolish, and sometimes disastrous, mistakes.  Ariely not only gives us a great read; he also makes us much wiser.” – GEORGE AKERLOF, 2001 Nobel Laureate in Economics, University of California at Berkeley, Koshland Professor of Economics

“Dan Ariely is a genius at understanding human behavior:  no ecomomist does a better job of uncovering and explaining the hidden reasons for the weird ways we act, in the marketplace and out.  Predictably Irrational will reshape the way you see the world, and yourself, for good.”JAMES SUROWIECKI, author of “The Wisdom of Crowds”

Stop in at your local bookstore, grab a cup of coffee, and read a few pages of Dan Ariely’s book. Or go online and take a look.  Who knows, you might find the material as interesting as I did and decide buy it and read all of it.  Then take some of what you’ve learned and challenge yourself.  Consider how you have approached your business and whether you have been asking the right questions — or just assuming your leaders have your best interests at heart.  Heck, perhaps the discussions on this blog and others like it will improve and become more rational as a result as well.  Lord knows, that wouldn’t be all bad. 

Speaking of Amway, how ”predictably irrational” or “rational” do you think IBOs are? 

written by Chuck Lia \\ tags: , , ,

Jun 18

“The worth and value of knowledge is in proportion to the worth and value of its object.” SAMUEL T. COLERIDGE

Don’t we all enjoy the expectant smiles on the faces of newlyweds on their wedding day?  In fact, I would say there are few newlywed couples that don’t have special dreams for their marriages on that special day.  Both the bride and the groom envision a happy home, smiling children, fun times, and growing old with their mates.  Sadly, sometimes their dreams are later shattered by the infidelity or dishonesty of a partner — or even both partners.  The result?  The trust they once had in each other is undermined and the relationship becomes broken.  Some couples are able to recover and to recapture their marriage dreams and rebuild their relationship – perhaps even stronger than before the infidelity.  But others are not.  For some, the personal hurt and the harm to the relationship was too great and too painful for one or both of the spouses to overcome.

In “rdknyvr’s” June 7th post he asked the question “How do you recapture your dream?”.  I was surprised to find that all of the posted comments discussed only one side of the issue, the internal mindset of the IBO.  Many seemed to believe that an IBO’s loss of his dream was indicative of a weakness in that IBO’s mind, heart, or will; and all he needed to do was read another book or listen to a CD or two to begin to get back on track.  While I agree the IBO’s mindset is an issue, it is only half of the story — and maybe not even the most important half.  I am convinced there is an undiscussed aspect of this “lost dream” issue that is equally, if not more, important:  the worthiness of the object of your dream, the worthiness of the object of your trust.

As I said, some couples aren’t able to recapture their dream and restore their marriage.  One spouse simply no longer believes in the long-term trustworthiness of their mate.  On the other hand, those married couples who are able to recapture their dreams do so as a result of both spouses exhibiting daily trustworthiness toward each other over a period of time.  And that is the key factor:  daily trustworthiness toward each other over a period of time.  It doesn’t happen in a week or a month.  It often takes months and years.  Day after day the husband must demonstrate that he loves and cherishes his wife.  Day after day the wife must demonstrate that she respects and loves her husband.  Both spouses must demonstrate through their daily behavior that they are worthy of their mate’s trust if the dreams they initially had for their marriage are going to be recaptured and rekindled.  Ultimately, if a spouse really believes his or her mate can truly be trusted in the relationship, that spouse can begin recapturing again the dream he or she once held for their marriage, and begin to move forward with confidence.

The same is true in this business.

To be candid, one of my own struggles with the Amway business has been this issue of broken trust.  Before I go further, let me state for the record this is just my opinion.  Your experience and opinion might be different.  Regardless, I believe some, if not all, of the IBO training systems have violated on some level the trust they were given by rank-and-file IBOs.  I’m not sure of all of the reasons, but without wanting to impugn anyone’s motives, greed and control immediately come to mind.  Let me be clear here.  I do not think all tool systems are equally culpable, but I do believe all systems are somewhat culpable.  The lack of transparency and full disclosure about tool system issues has been pathetic, unconscionable, and inexcusable.  Often training materials, CDs, and books endorsed and promoted by tool systems have been little more than Yugo quality drivel, but at a BMW price.  For example, you could easily find two dozen far better business and personal motivation books in ten minutes on BarnesandNoble.com for less money than you pay your tool systems for some of the mediocre books they promote — and earn PV/BV to boot.

At the same time Amway has also violated the trust it has been given by rank-and-file IBOs to provide quality products at a reasonable price and to guard the integrity of the business.  It has allowed tool systems to operate virtually unrestrained for years.  Most, but not all, of the substantial lawsuits the company has been drawn into over the past three decades originated with a tool system issue, as IBO leaders battled each other over tool system income payouts and other issues, and the company was drawn into their battles.  In addition, Amway had little incentive to improve its products or pricing because the lack of profitability from product movement was hidden behind the substantial incomes IBO leaders earned from the tool systems.  Tool system income and the personal use business model insulated the company from the business realities of many of its non-competitively priced products.  Thus company products were often Acura quality, but at a Ferrari price. 

One-sided arbitration processes, broad in scope non-compete clauses, heavyhanded enforcement approaches, and an unwillingness to candidly discuss negative business issues, have also worked to undermine trust and respect.  Some have even backfired against the business.  This lack of transparency and honesty about product and company issues and the business model itself has been nothing less than a huge disappointment to me.

Yet, even through all of that, I, like many of you, want to trust the company.  I truly want the company to be a business vehicle worthy of my trust and worthy of the investment of my time and effort.   There was a time when this business had a strong moral imperative, when integrity was a non-negotiable, when trust had been earned over many years, and that earned trust was valued and protected.  Somewhere, at some point in time, at least in the North American market, it appears everyone lost their way.

Thankfully, the UK situation and other recent legal issues were a real wakeup call and got the attention of everyone.

Pastor Timothy Keller of Manhattan, New York, uses an example to make an interesting point in his book The Reason For God. He says,

“Imagine you are on a high cliff and you lose your footing and begin to fall.  Just beside you as you fall is a branch sticking out of the very edge of the cliff.  It is your only hope and it is more than strong enough to support your weight.  How can it save you?  If your mind is filled with intellectual certainty that the branch can support you, but you don’t actually reach out and grab it, you are lost.  If your mind is instead filled with doubts and uncertainty that the branch can hold you, but you reach out and grab it anyway, you will be saved.  Why?  It is not the strength of your faith but the object of your faith that actually saves you.  Strong faith in a weak branch is fatally inferior to weak faith in a strong branch.”  (bold italics mine) 

To take the point a step further, one of the key issues in having worthwhile dreams is finding a strong branch, an object (read “a business vehicle”) worthy of your faith, dreams, and efforts.  At the present time I am not convinced Amway is the strong branch I believe it needs to be.  I believe it can be, but I do not believe it is that branch today.  Over the past decade I am sure there have been thousands of ABOs in the UK who trusted Amway to be their strong branch and the vehicle to achieve their dreams.  Have they been rewarded for their trust?  Have they been rewarded for centering their dreams on their Amway businesses?  Are the issues rank-and-file ABOs have in the UK today due to their lack of belief or their lack of a dream?  Or are they due more to the lack of daily faithfulness by Amway and some tool system leaders to the trust they were given by ABOs?  I think a quick read of the judge’s final ruling in the DBERR v. Amway UK case provides a clear answer.    

So to recapture our dreams it isn’t enough for an IBO to take his mind, heart, and will in hand.  It’s equally important for the company and IBO tool system leaders to take themselves in hand, to act on a daily basis in a manner commensurate with the trust they have been given. 

Let me ask you, which of these options might you prefer?  A business with a mediocre product line but a great business model; or a business with a great product line but a mediocre business model?  My answer?  Neither.  Neither business would be a worthwhile object of my trust or faith, nor worthy of my dreams or efforts.  Rooting my dreams and investing my effort in either business approach would be incredibly foolish in my opinion. 

I’m looking for a business with great product line and a great business model — one worthy of my trust and an investment of my time and energy.  Product line is not enough on its own.  Business model is not enough on its own (and, for the sake of discussion, I am including tool systems when I say “business model”).  It takes both quality products and a solid, integrity based business model. 

A business with respect for all IBOs all the time.  A business that views transparency, honesty, and openness as part and parcel of the very fabric of its business.  A business that, to borrow a biblical phrase, “swears to its own hurt.”  A business with a vast Ellis Island and a small Berlin Wall (and you know what I mean by that).  A business that becomes so competent at doing what it has set out to do it doesn’t matter what its competition is doing.  A business with a few less legal eagles and a few more Jon M. Huntsmans.  [Read Huntsman’s book “Winners Never Cheat:  Everyday Values We Learned As Children (But May Have Forgotten)” and you’ll understand what I saying.]  A business with less hype and spin, and more truth and candor.  A business with an unfettered commitment by everyone at the company and in the field to real transformation, rather than a business that sometimes acts like a bipolar teenager giving it lip service. 

That would be a good place to start in rebuilding trust with me.  How about you?

When I begin to really see that kind of a business day after day, not just when it suits the company or IBO leadership – a business truly worthy of my trust and efforts — that’s when I will start believing far more deeply in the company and its potential to again be the vehicle to help me achieve my personal and business goals. 

And that’s when I will begin recapturing my dreams in the business again. 

written by Chuck Lia \\ tags: , ,